Harry Cassin Publisher and Editor

Andy Spalding Senior Editor

Jessica Tillipman Senior Editor

Richard L. Cassin Editor at Large

Elizabeth K. Spahn Editor Emeritus 

Cody Worthington Contributing Editor

Julie DiMauro Contributing Editor

Thomas Fox Contributing Editor

Marc Alain Bohn Contributing Editor

Bill Waite Contributing Editor

Shruti J. Shah Contributing Editor

Russell A. Stamets Contributing Editor

Richard Bistrong Contributing Editor 

Eric Carlson Contributing Editor

Bill Steinman Contributing Editor

FCPA Blog Daily News

« SEC fines Health Net Inc. for severance agreements that stifled whistleblowers | Main | This Morgan Stanley isn't the Morgan Stanley you think it is »

Why are kleptocrats so are hard to get rid of?

Corruption, we often hear, "undermines democratic institutions." That's a sterilized phrase. What does it really mean?

Start with a legitimately elected leader. If he's weak and greedy -- as many people are -- he takes a few small bribes in return for helping cronies game the system.

The bribes are a breach of trust and have to be kept secret.

As time passes and bribes mount, the stakes go up.

The leader's family and friends become part of the graft machine. They collect bribes through phony companies. They launder bribe money by buying luxury properties in France or New York or Vancouver.

Leaving office becomes more and more dangerous. Once out of power, the leader and his gang would be vulnerable. Keeping power is the only option.

To hold on, the leader corrupts judges and legislators. He buys the loyalty of generals. He pays off or threatens those who control the ballot boxes. Elections, if they still happen, are now phony.

Doing all that costs big money. So the leader becomes a full-blown kleptocrat. Treasuries are looted and resources stripped.

Now what?

Regimes led by kleptocrats (dictators) may look stable but they're not.

Bullied and victimized citizens will eventually fight back. They decide life is so bad that risking death is worth it. That might take ten years, or twenty, or even longer. But they'll rise up and the regime will come to a disastrous end.

That's what the Arab Spring was about. It's how Suharto lost Indonesia. Tito’s Yugoslavia eventually fell apart. People Power in the Philippines swept Marcos from office. The Somoza family ruled Nicaragua for 45 years but couldn't hold on. The Shah lost his Peacock Throne in Iran. And so on.

When the end comes, kleptocrats scramble to save themselves and their families. Some live through it. Very often, though, mobs show up and demand heads.

Yes, graft "undermines democratic institutions." That's why it's important to fight against corruption and for transparency. It's the only way to keep the kleptocrats away.


Richard L. Cassin is the publisher and editor of the FCPA Blog. He'll be the keynote speaker at the FCPA Blog NYC Conference 2016.

Reader Comments (2)

This so much needed to be spoken. Appreciate your works.
August 19, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterTjones
It is true that transparency is the best way to fight corruption in politics Unfortunately, with politicians creating the rules they play by, it's essentially a game of "The fox guarding the henhouse"
August 19, 2016 | Unregistered CommenterMichael F.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.