Harry Cassin Publisher and Editor

Andy Spalding Senior Editor

Jessica Tillipman Senior Editor

Richard L. Cassin Editor at Large

Elizabeth K. Spahn Editor Emeritus 

Cody Worthington Contributing Editor

Julie DiMauro Contributing Editor

Thomas Fox Contributing Editor

Marc Alain Bohn Contributing Editor

Bill Waite Contributing Editor

Shruti J. Shah Contributing Editor

Russell A. Stamets Contributing Editor

Richard Bistrong Contributing Editor 

Eric Carlson Contributing Editor

Bill Steinman Contributing Editor

FCPA Blog Daily News

« 'Corruption Tours' Are A Hot Ticket In Prague | Main | China’s 'Official Liquor' Is Bribe Of Choice »

Top Ten Disgorgements (March 2012)

Since we listed the top ten FCPA disgorgements a year ago, two new companies joined the list -- Johnson & Johnson and Magyar Telekom. They replaced GE and Baker Hughes.

The top ten disgorgements now total $1.015 billion.

(As far as we know, all that money has stayed with the U.S. government. But last week, an NGO in Nigeria proposed that foreign governments share in some or all of the civil penalties and disgorgements paid to settle FCPA enforcement actions.)

Here are the SEC's current top ten FCPA-related disgorgements (including prejudgment interest):

1. Siemens $350 million in 2008.

2. KBR  $177 million in 2009.

3. Snamprogetti $125 million in 2010.

4. Technip $98 million in 2010.

5. Daimler $91.4 million in 2010.

6. Johnson & Johnson $48.6 million in 2011.

7. Alcatel-Lucent $45 million in 2010.

8. Magyar Telekom Plc $31.2 million in 2011.

9. Chevron $25 million in 2007.

10. Pride $23.5 million in 2010.

For comparison, here's our current list of the top ten FCPA enforcement actions. It includes both DOJ and SEC recoveries.

Some background: Disgorgement first appeared in an FCPA case in 2004, when ABB Ltd disgorged $5.9 million to settle civil antibribery, books-and-records, and internal-controls offenses. The SEC now uses disgorgement as a remedy in more than three quarters of its FCPA enforcement actions.

Disgorgement is technically not intended as a tool to punish, Marc Alain Bohn said in a guest post last year. Instead it's a vehicle for preventing unjust enrichment. The SEC is therefore only permitted to recover the approximate amount earned from the alleged illicit activities. Disgorging anything more would be considered punitive.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.