Search

Editors

Richard L. Cassin Publisher and Editor

Julie DiMauro Executive Editor

Andy Spalding Senior Editor

Jessica Tillipman Senior Editor

Elizabeth K. Spahn Contributing Editor

Eric Carlson Contributing Editor

Michael Kuria Contributing Editor

Thomas Fox Contributing Editor

Philip Fitzgerald Contributing Editor

Marc Alain Bohn Contributing Editor

Michael Scher Contributing Editor

Bill Waite Contributing Editor

Shruti J. Shah Contributing Editor

Russell A. Stamets Contributing Editor

Connect

Subscribe to receive the free FCPA Blog daily

Close
FCPA Blog Daily News

« Parker Drilling in $15.85 million settlement | Main | Wal-Mart’s Victims Part II: The Discourse of White-Collar Crime »
Tuesday
Apr162013

Supreme Court denies Bourke review

As reported by the SCOTUS Blog, the U.S. Supreme Court Monday denied Frederic Bourke's petition for certiorari (review) of his 2009 conviction for conspiracy to violate the FCPA and lying to FBI agents.

Bourke was sentenced to a year and a day in prison.

He's been free on bail pending the exhaustion of all his appeals.

Last year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied Bourke's request for a new trial.

He argued that prosecutors knowingly allowed a key witness to present false testimony to the jury.

Bourke had separately appealed in 2011 to the Second Circuit, arguing that the trial judge gave faulty jury instructions on the knowledge standard. He lost that appeal.

The trial court also denied his motion for a new trial.

The key witness against Bourke, who co-founded the Dooney & Bourke luxury handbag brand, was Hans Bodmer, a Swiss lawyer who once worked for Viktor Kozeny. Bourke was accused of joining Kozeny's conspiracy to bribe officials in Azerbaijan.

Bodmer pleaded guilty in 2004 to a money laundering conspiracy in the scheme. He was sentenced in March to time served.

Bourke had argued that prosecutors allowed Bodmer to testify to important dates in the bribery plot while knowing some of his testimony would be wrong.

At the Supreme Court, Bourke raised issues about the propriety of the trial judge's jury instructions on 'conscious disregard' and 'willful blindness' and the knowledge standard under the FCPA.

He also argued against the basis for the jury's decision on his conspiracy conviction, and whether prosecutors had the right to withhold exculpatory evidence related to Bodmer's testimony.

With Bourke's appeals now apparently ended, he faces the prospect of serving his prison sentence.

He was also ordered by the trial judge to pay a $1 million criminal fine.

Bourke's petition for certiorari, the appellate court opinion, and some of the briefs filed in his case are available from the SCOTUS Blog here.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.