Search

Editors

Richard L. Cassin Publisher and Editor

Andy Spalding Senior Editor

Jessica Tillipman Senior Editor

Michael Scher
Senior Editor

Elizabeth K. Spahn Contributing Editor

Julie DiMauro Contributing Editor

Eric Carlson Contributing Editor

Michael Kuria Contributing Editor

Thomas Fox Contributing Editor

Philip Fitzgerald Contributing Editor

Marc Alain Bohn Contributing Editor

Bill Waite Contributing Editor

Shruti J. Shah Contributing Editor

Russell A. Stamets Contributing Editor

Connect

Subscribe to receive the free FCPA Blog daily

Close
FCPA Blog Daily News

« Fox Remembers; Holder Replies | Main | Wen To Mandarins: Last Call »
Thursday
Apr052012

Flash: Courts Can Strike Unconstitutional Laws

It's not our fault that we're off topic.

Because there's never been a week so weird for SCOTUS news as this one, at least not during our lifetime.

The president questioned the right of 'unelected' supreme court justices to review federal statutes. That was Monday.

The next day, a judge at the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the DOJ to turn in a writing assignment -- three pages, single spaced. Tell me, the judge said, whether or not the Obama administration believes the courts have the right to strike down a federal law.

By Wednesday, the backlash against the president's comments forced Attorney General Holder, above, to say something no attorney general of the United States has needed to say since 1803: 'We respect the decisions made by the courts since Marbury v. Madison. Courts have the final say.'

If that story line had been made up for an episode of The West Wing, everyone would have said it was too preposterous.

*     *     *

But oh, Marbury v. Madison. Yes, from 1803. Establishing judicial review -- the right of the courts to review federal laws and invalidate anything offensive to the Constitution.

We know that case and always will. From our first day of law school. The first meeting of our constitutional law class. In a basement under an old chapel because the paint in the renovated lecture hall hadn't dried yet. One hundred twenty five newbies squirming on folding chairs.

The thin, bearded professor said, 'I trust you all read the first assignment posted on the bulletin board. So what is the importance of Marbury v. Madison?'

"Near the back,' he said, pointing at us. 'Please tell us about Marbury v. Madison.'

A short explanation. Then those magical words from the professor. 'That's right. That's what the case was about. Very good.'

We're not saying our first day of law school was the high point of our legal career. But it was close. To have survived an opening day question about Marbury v. Madison still seems like a miracle, a career-shaping crossroad.

It could have been much worse. Terrible in fact.

Like the first day performance by the fictional James Hart in the 1973 movie the Paper Chase.

Here's Hart's first contracts class with Professor Kingsfield:

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.