Search

Editors

Richard L. Cassin Publisher and Editor

Julie DiMauro Executive Editor

Andy Spalding Senior Editor

Jessica Tillipman Senior Editor

Michael Scher
Senior Editor

Elizabeth K. Spahn Contributing Editor

Eric Carlson Contributing Editor

Michael Kuria Contributing Editor

Thomas Fox Contributing Editor

Philip Fitzgerald Contributing Editor

Marc Alain Bohn Contributing Editor

Bill Waite Contributing Editor

Shruti J. Shah Contributing Editor

Russell A. Stamets Contributing Editor

Connect

Subscribe to receive the free FCPA Blog daily

Close
FCPA Blog Daily News

« Top Ten Disgorgements (March 2012) | Main | D&B Suspends Operations At China Unit »
Tuesday
Mar202012

China’s 'Official Liquor' Is Bribe Of Choice

From the China Compliance Digest (Issue No. 7: March 19, 2012):

Known as 'China’s national liquor,' Moutai has become a mainstay of official government dinners and receptions, despite its per-bottle price of 2,000 yuan (US$316). Proposals to ban Moutai at government-funded events have become common in recent years.

On March 9, Moutai executive Liu Zili prompted widespread outcry when he responded to one such proposal, “If Moutai was banned, I would be confused what drink could be served at government receptions. Should it be Lafite (French wine Chateau Lafite Rothschild) instead?”

In a March 4 Newsweek article, Chinese liquor expert Zhao Chen said, “Chinese people have a saying—‘Those that buy Moutai don’t drink it; those that drink Moutai don’t buy it.’”

Professor Wang Ning of Zhongshan University recently put a finer point on it: “Buyers often use public funds, and sometimes their own money, to buy this wine in order to bribe government officials.”

Sources: Xinhua News, Newsweek

________________

For a limited time, subscribers to the FCPA Blog will receive a complimentary one-month subscription to the China Compliance Digest. Subscribe to the FCPA Blog by filling in the box on the left under 'Connect.'

Reader Comments (1)

Wine with dinner, in my opinion, can never be a bribe. I don't care how much it costs, if you're going to drink it with the meal, it's not a bribe. I'm skeptical that a meal itself, if you're there and eating with the official, can ever be considered a bribe. Okay, if you *flew the official* somewhere to eat, that's an issue. But a local meal, even in a really nice restaurant...I just don't think it's a problem. Companies pay attention to it because they get scared into it, but has there ever been a case where a nice meal was even part of the allegations? I can't think of one off the top of my head. Companies are right to pay attention because it's a gateway into more problematic things. But the meal itself, no.

Wine as a gift gets trickier. And giving away auction-quality wine or specialty liquors that cost over $1,000, that kind of thing, is truly problematic.

But with a meal, and I think you're fine.
March 21, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterHoward Sklar

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.