Search

Editors

Richard L. Cassin Publisher and Editor

Andy Spalding Senior Editor

Jessica Tillipman Senior Editor

Michael Scher
Senior Editor

Elizabeth K. Spahn Contributing Editor

Julie DiMauro Contributing Editor

Eric Carlson Contributing Editor

Michael Kuria Contributing Editor

Thomas Fox Contributing Editor

Philip Fitzgerald Contributing Editor

Marc Alain Bohn Contributing Editor

Bill Waite Contributing Editor

Shruti J. Shah Contributing Editor

Russell A. Stamets Contributing Editor

Connect

Subscribe to receive the free FCPA Blog daily

Close
FCPA Blog Daily News

« Are We Scared Yet? | Main | Whistling While They Work »
Wednesday
Mar232011

Setback For Lindsey Prosecution

The DOJ yesterday suffered what could be a key defeat in the battle over who's a "foreign official" under the FCPA when the judge blocked submission of an extraordinary State Department declaration.

Last Friday, the government in the Lindsey case filed a supplemental memorandum and declaration of a U.S. State Department official concerning the defendants' motion to dismiss the indictment on the "foreign official" issue.

The State Department official -- Clifton M. Johnson, Assistant Legal Adviser for Law Enforcement and Intelligence in the Legal Adviser's Office -- said the judge should not grant the defendants' motion to dismiss because it would adversely impact U.S. foreign policy. He asserted that the FCPA was consistent with the OECD anti-bribery convention and that the "foreign official" and state-owned entity coverage of the FCPA must be maintained. 

The defendants filed a motion to strike the government's supplemental pleading and the declaration of the State Department official. They argued that the declaration was inappropriate and without a legal basis because the State Department's opinion about how a federal criminal statute should be interpreted was irrelevant.

The defendants also argued that federal judges are not required to bow to foreign policy concerns, but rather have a duty to interpret federal criminal statutes in a manner consistent with the Constitution and federal law.

Judge Matz granted the defendants motion to strike the government's supplemental filing and the declaration of the State Department official on Tuesday afternoon, handing a significant setback to the DOJ in the case. 

As a result, the hearing on the defendants' motion to dismiss on grounds that the FCPA does not apply to officials of foreign, state-owned entities will go ahead tomorrow morning as scheduled.

Jan L. Handzlik of Greenberg Traurig is defending Lindsey Manufacturing and Dr. Keith Lindsey. Steve K. Lee is represented by Janet Levine of Crowell & Moring.

The case is styled U.S. v. Noriega et al, U.S. District Court, Central District of California (Western Division - Los Angeles), Case #: 2:10-cr-01031-AHM-4.

Download a copy of the February 28, 2011 motion to dismiss the superseding indictment by Lindsey Manufacturing Company, Dr. Keith Lindsey, and Steve K. Lee here.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.