Search

Editors

Richard L. Cassin Publisher and Editor

Andy Spalding Senior Editor

Jessica Tillipman Senior Editor

Elizabeth K. Spahn Editor Emeritus

Cody Worthington Contributing Editor

Julie DiMauro Contributing Editor

Thomas Fox Contributing Editor

Marc Alain Bohn Contributing Editor

Bill Waite Contributing Editor

Shruti J. Shah Contributing Editor

Russell A. Stamets Contributing Editor

Richard Bistrong Contributing Editor 

Eric Carlson Contributing Editor

Bill Steinman Contributing Editor

Aarti Maharaj Contributing Editor


FCPA Blog Daily News

« News From The Neighborhood | Main | Is The Government Listening? »
Wednesday
Nov102010

Both Sides Now

Yesterday's post in this space about the U.K. Proceeds of Crime Act came from Barry Vitou and Richard Kovalevsky QC, who write thebriberyact.com.

Today we've reciprocated with a note to thebriberyact.com about the FCPA and judicial review.

Because the FCPA and the Bribery Act reach everywhere, many companies will need to start complying with both. That's going to be trickier than it sounds, partly because of differences between the two laws.

And it's why new resources with practical, high-level discussion, like thebriberyact.com, are so important.

Reader Comments (2)

The most talked-about difference between the UK Act and the FCPA: no facilitation payments, frankly isn't that much different from what most companies do now. Facilitation payments are just too tricky to monitor in any real way, so most companies do one of two things: outlaw them, or make an approval process so high-level (approval by the CEO kind of thing) that the approval process is a disincentive. Most companies then just ignore the whole issue. When I talk to companies about whether their chart of accounts has a place to accurately label facilitation payments, most don't know what a chart of accounts is.

The biggest change is the prohibition on commercial, that is, non-governmental, bribery. Compliance officers started getting nervous after the CCI case where the DOJ used the Travel Act to prosecute private bribery. That's a game changer. The Bribery Act just codified the new reality. And for compliance officers, it's an unwelcome reality. The impact on the operational functions of the business---sales and marketing particularly---just exploded, and made compliance officers' jobs that much harder.
November 10, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterHoward@OpenAir
Both this blog and thebriberyact.com have been displaying great commentary of the events surrounding the UK Bribery Act and the FCPA. The fact that many businesses are going to have to comply with both laws is going to be a big challenge for a lot of companies- but is certainly necessary to make business transactions fair and ethical. The introduction of the Bribery Act ups the ante, but I think this is the kick companies need to keep a closer eye on how business is being conducted throughout their companies.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.